[ad_1]
The corporate is interesting a current ruling that rejected its request for a brand new trial. REX has been feuding with Zillow for years now.
Within the newest chapter in a long-running feud, now-defunct low cost brokerage REX has filed a brand new movement that goals to maintain its battle with Zillow alive a bit longer.
REX — also referred to as Actual Property Change — filed the movement Monday. The movement is an attraction to a current ruling in opposition to REX and is actually pushing for the chance to carry a brand new trial within the firm’s lawsuit in opposition to Zillow. The lawsuit started in 2021 and centered on the observe of conserving listings from MLS sources separate from those who don’t come from an MLS.
REX was a reduction brokerage that attempted to bypass the normal a number of itemizing service system and market on to customers. The corporate argued within the go well with that Zillow’s observe of conserving the listings separate harm REX’s enterprise.
The brand new movement is a response to a January order by which a decide rejected REX’s request for a brand new trial. REX had made the request in November after shedding a jury trial in September. The jury in that trial finally concluded REX didn’t show Zillow used false promoting because it separated non-MLS listings from their MLS counterparts, making them obtainable on a distinct web page of its web site. The jury additionally stated Zillow proved it was harmless of a second allegation of partaking in unfair or misleading acts.
The jury verdict moreover got here a couple of weeks after the courtroom dismissed all antitrust allegations that have been a part of the lawsuit, which had initially focused each Zillow and the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors.
The jury choice may have ended the case, and REX has lengthy since ceased to function as a brokerage. Nevertheless, the agency as a substitute opted to press on.
REX’s November request for a brand new trial argued that it was unfairly barred from presenting testimony about actual property commissions to jurors and that the courtroom allowed Zillow to “improperly escape legal responsibility” in opposition to false promoting and shopper deception claims.
Nevertheless, the decide rejected these arguments. In his January choice, Choose Thomas Zilly stated that REX was “ably represented, each earlier than and through trial, by a number of attorneys from well-regarded legislation companies.” The decide additionally stated REX had “greater than ample sources” to pursue the case, and that the corporate’s attorneys had alternatives to file motions, provide proof and do different issues to show their factors.
The end result, the decide dominated, was that REX’s failure within the go well with wasn’t the results of a “procedural flaw” or an “error on the a part of the courtroom” — and so it could not get a brand new trial.
The most recent movement filed Monday asks the USA Court docket of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reverse that call and let the case proceed. Solely time will inform, although, if REX can be granted the flexibility to struggle on.
Learn REX’s newest movement right here:
E-mail Jim Dalrymple II
[ad_2]
Source link