[ad_1]
One option to display the slant in PBS’s protection of the Israel-Hamas battle is to match and distinction how their interviewers deal with representatives of the respective sides. On Monday’s version of the PBS NewsHour, reporter Leila Molana-Allen performed a pleasant interview with Mohammad Shtayyeh, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority, which represents the West Financial institution, and who has didn’t condemn the Hamas atrocities.
Notice Bennett has already positioned the onus on Israel, not on the instigators of the battle, Hamas.
After opening with Shtayyeh ranting that Israel’s battle was “towards kids, ladies, college professors, clergymen, cooks” and never Hamas, Leila Molana-Allen opened with a tricky query.
However the remainder of her inquiries to Shtayyeh have been non-challenging. A small pattern:
She provided her hand on the finish of the interview, and the 2 shook fingers.
Now the distinction.
On Tuesday, PBS reporter Nick Schifrin talked remotely from the studio with Mark Regev, senior advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel is waging a counterattack to decimate Hamas and to rescue Israeli civilian hostages, together with kids, taken on October 7. But Schifrin’s tone towards Regev was rather more difficult than was Molana-Allen’s speak with the Palestinian Authority chief.
After Regev identified that kids have been among the many hostages held by Hamas, Schifrin wished Israel to provide slightly in Hamas’s path. “You’ve got stated, that the army operation, you hope, pressures them to launch hostages. Are you additionally offering any carrots to Hamas to persuade them to launch hostages?” he wished to know.
When Schifrin pushed the Palestinian Authority’s so-called “two-state answer.” Regev pushed again, noting “the P.A. has but to sentence these assaults.” Schifrin instantly modified the topic:
Schifrin reframed his accusative query: “If Israel might kill one Hamas commander, and take out one tunnel and for instance, know that 100 civilians might be killed, would you’re taking that shot?”
PBS NewsHour
11/6/23
7:11:37 p.m. (ET)
Geoff Bennett: A significant participant in Palestinian life is essentially sidelined on this newest and bloodiest battle, the Palestinian Authority.
Because it was evicted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007, the P.A. has ruled the components of the West Financial institution it controls.
Leila Molana-Allen sat down with the Palestinian Authority prime minister for a uncommon interview, and requested him concerning the state of the Israeli floor invasion of Gaza.
Mohammad Shtayyeh, Palestinian Prime Minister: Israel is launching a complete battle towards the Palestinian folks. This battle just isn’t towards Hamas. This battle is towards kids, ladies, college professors, clergymen, cooks, you identify it.
Take a look at the record of Palestinians who’ve been killed. They’ve names. They’ve their moms. They’ve fathers. They’ve desires. There are greater than 1,000 Palestinians who’re below the rubble. In Gaza, we do not have the gear. We do not have the bulldozers to take away the rubble at this stage.
So it’s a catastrophic scenario. And the Israelis are the occupiers. So, when folks talk about self-defense, a self — an occupier just isn’t in a self-defense scenario. An occupier is an attacker, an aggressor.
Leila Molana-Allen: The Hamas management is sitting there saying there might be a second and a 3rd and a fourth October 7. How might Israel probably step again and say, OK, we will lighten off on the invasion?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: I do not see issues that means.
I see issues in a very totally different perspective. The Israeli intentions has by no means been to actually attain an settlement with the Palestinians. So, the Palestinians are indignant, pissed off. They do not anymore consider in what Israel claims, that it’s prepared for peace.
Look what is going on right now. This Israeli authorities is essentially the most aggressive authorities within the historical past of the battle. A few of them are thirsty for Palestinian blood, and they’re calling for killing Palestinians.
Leila Molana-Allen: Prime Minister Netanyahu has been very clear that, after this battle, Israel has no real interest in governing Gaza once more. They clearly should not keen to have Hamas in energy in Gaza. What’s your perspective to that, to moving into and taking management of Gaza?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: Palestinian Authority has by no means been away from Gaza. Now we have been offering electrical energy. Now we have been offering water. Now we have been offering schooling materials. We pay the salaries for the lecturers. We pay the salaries for the docs.
Now we have been in command of each single day. We problem the passports for Gaza. So, our relationship with Gaza by no means stopped for the final 17 years. Now, we’re not going to go to Gaza on an Israeli army tank.
We’re going to go to Gaza as a part of an answer that offers with the query of Palestine, that offers with occupation. So, for Mr. Netanyahu to say that he would not wish to intervene or management Gaza, he’s already controlling the West Financial institution, and he’s already — his military is in each village and each metropolis and each refugee camp.
Leila Molana-Allen: Now we have seen in the previous few weeks since this battle started an enormous escalation in violence within the West Financial institution. We’re seeing each day raids into Palestinian cities, cities, camps by the Israeli Protection Forces, numerous younger folks dying, additionally quite a lot of violence with settlement communities as properly.
Mohammad Shtayyeh: The principle objective for Israel to realize is to kill each future risk of a Palestinian impartial sovereign state. That’s the — what Netanyahu needs and that’s what the Israeli authorities needs.
So, the Israeli assault within the West Financial institution is in parallel with what has been occurring in Gaza, i.e., placing Gaza below siege. Land in Palestine, like in some other the place, is a zero sum recreation, is a zero sum recreation. Each single acre of land that the Israelis take is one acre of land that the Palestinians lose.
That’s what — the true struggling of individuals. You’ve got 68 totally different checkpoints. They take our water. They use our skies. They kill our youngsters; 5,200 Palestinians are in Israeli jail. That’s the reason the cycle of violence will repeat itself daily, each week, each month. They want an answer.
Leila Molana-Allen: There’s at all times a name for one thing. There’s at all times a name for one thing to vary, for an finish to the occupation, for a future for a Palestinian state.
The calls do not go wherever. At any time when there is a U.N. decision, folks do not take note of them anymore. What virtually would you like out of your Arab companions, out of your different companions, to make one thing occur?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: You might be proper. Palestinians are actually fed up with the statements, and Palestinians are fed up with United Nations resolutions, greater than 800 United Nations resolutions. Not one single one has ever been carried out.
Now there isn’t any room for extra negotiations. We’re sick of those negotiations. Palestinians, they need Israel to say that Israel is able to finish occupation that has occurred on the Palestinian territory after which put a timeframe for ending this occupation.
And I feel United States shouldn’t proceed to provide Israel the greenest of the inexperienced gentle to proceed its colonization, to proceed its atrocities, to steady its genocide towards the Palestinian folks.
Leila Molana-Allen: What ought to America’s function be proper now on this battle and shifting ahead to any type of peaceable answer after it ends?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: The one nation that has leverage over Israel is america. And I do not assume that america is utilizing that leverage.
The US has to give you an answer, must give you an initiative. This American administration is the one administration that doesn’t have a peace initiative. Secretary Blinken is right here, however that isn’t sufficient. It simply — it is not solely when you’ve got bloodshed, then the entire worldwide neighborhood come to Palestine and attempt to calm the scenario. And as an alternative of us keep away from one other spherical of bloodshed, we have to finish this battle.
Leila Molana-Allen: In between the instant ache and chaos of this battle and the long-term political targets of an answer is the on a regular basis lives of Palestinians residing right here.
Gaza has one of many highest unemployment charges on this planet. Within the West Financial institution, it is not that a lot better. And when Palestinian employees can work, it is by these very restricted permits given by Israel. How can younger Palestinians residing daily cope within the meantime?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: My foremost concern since I took workplace was to step by step disengage from this colonial dependency, create jobs for our folks, fairly than them working in Israel.
Palestinians have the very best college graduates within the area. Illiteracy fee in Palestine is zero. Palestinians are profitable entrepreneurs, very vibrant personal sector. All what they want is to not get up within the morning and be confronted with a checkpoint that doesn’t enable their items to maneuver from Hebron to Gaza or from Hebron to Jerusalem.
Leila Molana-Allen: The peace course of has been stalled for practically 20 years. Not a lot has developed.
Everybody I converse to, the one factor they are saying is, out of this horror that is occurring now, there must be afterwards an answer, some progress. The place are we by way of the chances for a peace plan, for a Palestinian state with the realities on the bottom?
Mohammad Shtayyeh: To be very real looking, issues are extraordinarily sophisticated, extraordinarily troublesome.
We face a scenario by which two-state answer is fading away. With this Israeli authorities, there isn’t any answer. So we do not have a accomplice. Palestinians are keen. We’re the celebration to learn most from any critical peaceable negotiations. So, Israel has to face the next actuality.
To kill us, they’re doing that. To deport us, they’re attempting to do this. The one factor that Israelis should not attempting is to dwell with us. They aren’t attempting that. And I feel, for them, not for us, the one factor that Israel ought to strive is to make peace with us.
Leila Molana-Allen: Prime Minister Shtayyeh, thanks a lot.
Mohammad Shtayyeh: Thanks.
PBS NewsHour
11/7/23
7:07:05 p.m. (ET)
Amna Nawaz: Final night time, we introduced you Leila’s interview with the Palestinian Authority prime minister, Mohammad Shtayyeh. Tonight, Nick Schifrin will get the angle of a prime adviser to the Israeli authorities.
Nick Schifrin: The Biden administration has been urgent Israel to restrict Palestinian casualties, have a plan for the way forward for Gaza, and President Biden confirmed tonight the request of pausing Israel’s army operation as a way to launch hostages.
To debate these requests and the Israeli operation, we flip to Mark Regev, senior adviser to the Israeli prime minister and a former Israeli ambassador to the UK. Thanks very a lot, Mark Regev. All the time a pleasure. Welcome again to the “NewsHour.”
As I stated, this night, President Biden confirmed he had requested Prime Minister Netanyahu for pauses as a way to launch hostages. The prime minister has confirmed — quote — “tactical little pauses, an hour right here, an hour there.”
However are you keen to think about what the president is requesting, a extra vital pause as a way to launch hostages?
Mark Regev, Senior Adviser to Israeli Prime Minister: Nicely, as you stated in your query, Nick — and thanks for having me — we’re open to pauses.
Now we have accomplished so up to now and we’re keen to take action sooner or later. Clearly, for instance, we had two pairs of hostages that have been launched, a pair of American ladies and a pair of aged Israeli ladies, individually. They usually have been launched within the framework of a neighborhood and time-limited pause in operations.
We did that additionally to facilitate the pattern, folks shifting out of hurt’s means, Gazan civilians shifting from the north to the south. Now we have accomplished it to facilitate the doorway of humanitarian materials into the Gaza Strip, meals, medication, water. So we have now accomplished it up to now. We are able to do it sooner or later.
Nick Schifrin: The pause to launch these two hostages have been to permit the ICRC to bodily transfer them.
However this pause request is extra detailed than that. Axios’ Barak Ravid is reporting the deal on the desk is a three-day pause for 10 to fifteen hostages, in addition to an inventory of all 240 hostages. Are you able to affirm that?
Mark Regev: I am not ready to verify that. I can let you know that we’re keen to do — after all, for us, the primary humanitarian problem is getting hostages out. And so, after all, to do this, we might be keen to do a pause. That is a given.
Nick Schifrin: How far are you keen to go?
Mark Regev: Nicely, clearly, it is a primary precedence for us. The hostages, 240 individuals are being held, of them, 30 kids, of them, a child 9 months previous, an toddler below the age of three. It simply exhibits you what we’re coping with, Nick.
Who — what kind of barbarians kidnap infants? What kind of barbarians kidnap toddlers? Sure, we’re coping with a really, very harmful terrorist group who has no qualms in any way about kidnapping kids. After all, we noticed what number of kids they killed after they invaded Israel. We’re coping with troublesome folks. We hope we will get our folks out. We consider the army stress on them for the time being will facilitate and expedite launch of hostages.
Nick Schifrin: You’ve got stated, that the army operation, you hope, pressures them to launch hostages.
Are you additionally offering any carrots to Hamas to persuade them to launch hostages?
Mark Regev: The army stress, we predict, is what must be accomplished.
There are, after all, in parallel, these talks that Qatar is conducting. Qatar has a relationship with Hamas. The Hamas management is — lives in Qatar. They’re hosted there by the federal government of Qatar. And Qatar tells the world, properly, we have now a relationship with these folks, and that is good for the West.
I imply, they’ve a relationship with individuals who dedicated the atrocities of a month in the past, October 7, the bloodbath, individuals who raped, who murdered, who massacred, who burnt folks alive, horrible, horrible issues. Now, they’re saying, the folks of the federal government of Qatar, they are saying, properly, this relationship serves the pursuits of the West.
OK, we’re ready to see. Are you able to leverage your relationship to expedite the discharge of hostages? Let’s have a look at. I hope they succeed. However we’re ready to see if there are outcomes
Nick Schifrin: And Qatar, after all, is true in the course of that hostage negotiation, as you say.
Let me transfer you on to the day after the battle in Gaza. Yesterday, the prime minister instructed ABC’s David Muir that Israel deliberate — quote — “indefinite safety management” over Gaza.
Are you able to clarify that? Does that embrace controlling any territory inside Gaza?
Mark Regev: So, we’re not speaking about any form of long-term Israeli occupation. Now we have no need to rule over the folks of Gaza. And we have now no need to control the Gaza Strip.
Now we have to make a distinction between political management and safety presence. Finally, we do not wish to defeat Hamas and destroy them simply to see one other group of terrorists come on and threaten us from the Gaza Strip once more. So, I feel, at the least initially, following this operation, to stop resurgent terrorist teams, we are going to want an Israeli polit — safety presence.
That does not essentially must be static. That might be fluid. That might be going out and in, as is required be, to cope with potential threats.
Nick Schifrin: You simply…
Mark Regev: Finally, we wish the folks of Gaza to control themselves.
Nick Schifrin: Sorry to interrupt, Mark. You simply slipped and virtually stated political presence.
Simply to verify, you aren’t speaking about any type of governance providing Gaza. You might be solely speaking a couple of safety presence. May that embrace a buffer zone?
Mark Regev: Sure, I consider there might be a buffer zone. There must be, after what we have now been by, sure.
However I feel the thought is, look, Hamas has been ruling the Gaza Strip for 16 years. They’ve produced nothing for the Palestinians of Gaza, nothing however ache, nothing however bloodshed, nothing however struggling, and nothing however impoverishment. Whoever comes after Hamas might be higher for Israel, as a result of our residents within the southern a part of my nation will be capable of dwell with out concern of getting their kids butchered in the course of the night time by terrorists coming from throughout the frontier.
And it in the end might be higher for the folks of Gaza, who deserve higher than this terrorist regime that does not give a hoot concerning the pursuits and the well-being of the Gazan civilian inhabitants. We see that in the way in which they’re performing on this battle.
Nick Schifrin: To have that peace in Southern Israel, after all, there must be governance in Gaza. The U.S. has instructed that governments might be taken over by the Palestinian Authority, which at present is in command of the West Financial institution.
The prime minister of the Palestinian Authority was requested by my colleague Leila Molana-Allen about this, and he stated — quote — “The P.A. is not going to go into Gaza on an Israeli army tank” and the one means the P.A. would take part within the governance of Gaza was — quote — “as part of an answer that offers with the query of Palestine, that offers with query of occupation.”
So will the Israeli authorities think about to pursue a two-state answer, if that’s what the P.A. requires to take over Gaza?
Mark Regev: Nicely, if we have been having a dialogue concerning the P.A., we’re a month after the horrific assaults of October 7, and the P.A. has but to sentence these assaults.
And if the P.A. needs to be thought-about a accomplice in peace, one has to ask why they refuse to sentence Hamas’ atrocities. Why cannot they condemn the rapes, the murders, the beheadings? You’ve got seen, we have now all seen the atrocities dedicated by Hamas. If they can not condemn that, what kind of accomplice in peace are they?
Nick Schifrin: Let me transfer to the air marketing campaign and the bottom marketing campaign in Gaza.
And let me present you some video over the previous few days, aftermath of an assault on the Jabalia refugee camp. The goal was Hamas commanders and a Hamas tunnel below that camp. And when the tunnel collapsed, a whole metropolis block collapsed, an unknown quantity.
So, let me ask you, what number of Gazans are you keen to kill inadvertently as a way to kill Hamas’ leaders and collapse that tunnel?
Mark Regev: So, we have now been calling, as you’ve got been — reported on the “NewsHour,” for weeks now, we have now been urging Palestinians within the Northern Gaza Strip to relocate south, as a result of we knew there could be intense combating within the north.
And we requested folks, please transfer out of hazard. We do not wish to see you caught up within the crossfire between us, between the Israel Protection Forces, and the Hamas terrorists.
And the reality is, the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants did transfer south. They did vote with their ft, they usually exited the realm. Now, Hamas tried to cease them. Hamas ordered folks to remain. Hamas truly introduced — created bodily boundaries and, at gunpoint, stored folks in.
However our objective was to get most individuals out of the fight space to maintain them secure, and most of them did depart.
Nick Schifrin: However, as , there are nonetheless 200 — so sorry to interrupt. Sorry to interrupt.
However there are nonetheless 200,000, 300,000 folks in Northern Gaza. Do you — if Israel might kill one Hamas commander or take out one tunnel and, for instance, know that 100 civilians might be killed, would you’re taking that shot?
Mark Regev: Nicely, initially, we do not know that 100 civilians have been killed, sure? Let’s be clear. We do not know.
I noticed a few of these footage from the bombing on the bomb web site. All of them seem like males of army age. And, after all, that the Hamas terrorists do not put on uniforms. And we have now to grasp that.
It additionally must be stated, all the knowledge popping out of Gaza is equipped by the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Well being, they usually’re giving out Hamas’ numbers, they usually must be taken with a grain of salt. And I even dare say that even the images popping out of Gaza are managed by Hamas. Now we have not seen — and I problem you, have we seen a single image of 1 Hamas terrorist killed by the Israelis in our strikes? No.
They solely present you footage of civilians. So, both you possibly can presume we’re solely killing civilians, which is clearly illogical, or that Hamas is managing to manage the images.
Nick Schifrin: However there are, after all, ladies and kids dying. And I solely have about 30 seconds, Mark. So let me simply ask this query. Do you are worried that Israel is creating a brand new era of Palestinians who will be a part of Hamas or no matter comes after with these bombings, or do you are worried that these bombings will create extra stress in your marketing campaign earlier than it is lastly over, earlier than you will get your targets accomplished?
Mark Regev: Nick, I hope that, on the finish of this operation, initially, that Hamas might be gone. And they are going to be gone. We are going to reach doing that.
However I feel we could have discredited the form of extremism, the form of fanaticism and the form of barbarism that Hamas has proven. Palestinians want to grasp that Hamas is a lifeless finish. Hamas solely guarantees a way forward for blood and struggling, whereas the previous — path of cooperation, the trail of negotiation, the trail of residing with Israel in peace, that gives a lot extra.
Nick Schifrin: Sure.
Mark Regev: And the Arab world has opened as much as Israel over the previous few years in methods like by no means earlier than.
Nick Schifrin: Sure.
Mark Regev: Now we have seen new relationships shaped with nations throughout the Gulf.
As , simply earlier than this disaster, there was speak of Israel and Saudi Arabia normalizing ties. It is time the Palestinians additionally joined the circle of peace.
Nick Schifrin: All proper, we must end it there. Mark Regev, senior adviser to the prime minister of Israel, thanks very a lot.
Mark Regev: Thanks for having me.
[ad_2]
Source link