[ad_1]
https://sputnikglobe.com/20231104/natos-backfired-ukraine-strategy-built-on-ideology-bribery–blackmail-1114706923.html
NATO’s ‘Backfired’ Ukraine Technique Constructed on ‘Ideology, Bribery & Blackmail’
NATO’s ‘Backfired’ Ukraine Technique Constructed on ‘Ideology, Bribery & Blackmail’
NATO’s “technique” carried out in Ukraine backfired as a result of it was “not fact-based”, Karen Kwiatkowski informed Sputnik.
2023-11-04T07:12+0000
2023-11-04T07:12+0000
2023-11-04T07:12+0000
evaluation
ukraine
valery zaluzhny
ukrainian counteroffensive try
karen kwiatkowski
pentagon
volodymyr zelensky
nato
vladimir putin
russia
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content material
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content material
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e7/09/04/1113103066_0:147:3119:1901_1920x0_80_0_0_15f21d7bf4f04f907cad70617c9df57d.jpg
The US-led Western grasp plan carried out in Ukraine backfired as a result of it was “not fact-based”, with Washington dipping into its playbook of using each “bribery” and “blackmail”, Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Division of Protection, informed Sputnik.Earlier, the Ukrainian military’s Сommander-in-Сhief Basic Valery Zaluzhny admitted that Kiev wanted to take an enormous technological leap to interrupt the present “stalemate” in its counteroffensive in opposition to Russian troops. “There’ll almost certainly be no deep and delightful breakthrough,” he underscored in an interview with the UK’s Economist journal.Resorting to each, the format of an article, after which that of an interview, Valery Zaluzhny had conceded that “NATO’s textbooks” and “the maths” that Kiev did to plan the much-heralded counteroffensive had failed to stop Russian forces from successfully tackling Ukrainian troops.Zaluzhny ruminated that the afore-mentioned NATO textbooks and the calculations had prompt that, “4 months ought to have been sufficient time for us [the Ukrainian army] to have reached Crimea, to have fought in Crimea, to return from Crimea and to have gone again out and in once more.”He was referring to the peninsula which opted to separate off from Ukraine after the February 2014 Euromaidan coup, voting overwhelmingly in a referendum in March 2014 to rejoin Russia. Ukraine had boasted of plans to make use of its counteroffensive launched in the summertime to grab the Crimea.Zaluzhny had additionally added that he was involved about the truth that “ultimately we [Kiev] will notice that we merely do not have sufficient folks to battle.” Accordingly, he struck up the well-familiar tune of demanding extra weapons from the West – one which Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky seems to have perfected. Thus, warning that there have been “heavier battles to return,” the Ukrainian high normal solicited help for Ukraine’s missile defence and air defence, and provided “calculations” as to “what number of tanks, artillery we’d like and so forth and so forth.”In impact, nevertheless, no quantity of subtle and billions-worth of weaponry was capable of support Kiev in its counteroffensive ambitions. The US-spearheaded Western technique had been to make use of Ukraine as a pawn in its proxy struggle to try to “isolate Russia economically, to weaken Russia’s army functionality, and to strengthen Ukraine as a possible EU and even NATO member,” Karen Kwiatkowski underscored. Nonetheless, “in every of those publicly said aims, if there was a technique to do these factor, it backfired and failed in all instances,” added the retired Lt-Col.Such “throughout the board failures” can solely imply that “both the technique was so unhealthy it ought to have by no means made it off the desk, or failure and destruction was the technique, only one not publicly said,” Kwiatkowski careworn.It ought to be famous that Valery Zaluzhny’s use of the phrase “stalemate” in reference to the Ukrainian counteroffensive was swiftly commented upon by Moscow. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the claims of a battlefield deadlock as false.Moreover, final month, Russian President Vladimir Putin described Kiev’s summer time counteroffensive try as a complete failure, not a stalemate, which he stated value Kiev large losses each in manpower and NATO-donated weaponry.Karen Kwiatkowski weighed in on the timing of the statements made by Ukraine’s commander-in-chief, voicing the opinion that he should be “in a tough place, “standing between a hole and demoralized” Ukrainian army, and above him a “delusional politician who has not determined find out how to finest save himself.” The latter was a reference to Ukraine’s President Zelensky. Late final month, a British newspaper reported that Ukraine’s failed counteroffensive had generated friction between Basic Zaluzhny and President Volodymyr Zelensky. In accordance with the paper, Zelensky insisted on additional counteroffensive makes an attempt, whereas Zaluzhny believed that the main focus ought to be on the Ukrainian military holding present positions and getting ready for subsequent 12 months’s assault.Valery Zaluzhny additionally referred to the continuing Ukraine battle as a “struggle of positions,” with the previous Pentagon analyst including that the Ukrainian normal appeared to understand “similarities within the battle with WWI, particularly within the evolution of a Maginot line model of protection”. The Maginot Line of fortifications constructed by France within the Nineteen Thirties to discourage invasion by Nazi Germany had been named after the French Minister of Battle André Maginot.As Washington struggles to maintain up with rising calls for to help its ally Israel in its battle in opposition to Hamas, and the Kiev regime amid its ongoing battle with Russia, Karen Kwiatkowski concluded:
https://sputnikglobe.com/20231102/ukrainian-top-general-we-are-in-a-stalemate-nato-textbooks-did-not-help-much-1114656040.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20231102/kremlin-says-words-of-ukrainian-commander-in-chief-about-impasse-on-battlefield-not-true-1114659353.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20231104/ukraine-is-yesterdays-news-in-us-but-war-hawks-will-keep-profiting—ex-lawmaker-1114705917.html
ukraine
russia
2023
Information
en_EN
kiev’s botched counteroffensive, nato technique in ukraine backfired, what’s nato objectives, is nato in ukraine, who’s profitable in ukraine, ukraine battle
kiev’s botched counteroffensive, nato technique in ukraine backfired, what’s nato objectives, is nato in ukraine, who’s profitable in ukraine, ukraine battle
Moscow was swift to shoot down Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Valery Zaluzhny’s claims of a battlefield deadlock made earlier within the week as removed from the reality, underscoring that Russia totally intends to achieve all of the aims of its particular army operation.
NATO’s “technique” was “ideology and home interest-based, in some instances primarily based on monetary bribery and power blackmail by the US. It was a technique of finance and army support/contracts somewhat than an precise technique“, identified Kwiatkowski.
“In a world with well-informed, logical and humanitarian management in Kiev and Washington, we might certainly contemplate Valery Zaluzhny’s analysis as a precursor to rapid negotiations with Russia. Everybody is prepared for that apart from Zelenksy, Biden, Blinken, Sullivan, Nuland, Senator Graham, and Congressman Schiff,” stated the pundit.
Resorting to each, the format of an article, after which that of an interview, Valery Zaluzhny had conceded that “NATO’s textbooks” and “the maths” that Kiev did to plan the much-heralded counteroffensive had failed to stop Russian forces from successfully tackling Ukrainian troops.
Zaluzhny ruminated that the afore-mentioned NATO textbooks and the calculations had prompt that, “4 months ought to have been sufficient time for us [the Ukrainian army] to have reached Crimea, to have fought in Crimea, to return from Crimea and to have gone again out and in once more.”
In impact, nevertheless, no quantity of subtle and billions-worth of weaponry was capable of support Kiev in its counteroffensive ambitions.
Ukraine misplaced over 90,000 servicemen killed and wounded since begin of counteroffensive on June 4, Russia’s Minister of Defence Sergei Shoigu stated on October 30. It was added that the Ukrainian counteroffensive had failed to attain vital success on the battlefield, with the Ukrainian forces dropping round 600 tanks and about 1,900 armored automobiles. The Russian Military will proceed to “methodically and confidently” perform assigned duties within the particular army op zone, added the Ministry.
The US-spearheaded Western technique had been to make use of Ukraine as a pawn in its proxy struggle to try to “isolate Russia economically, to weaken Russia’s army functionality, and to strengthen Ukraine as a possible EU and even NATO member,” Karen Kwiatkowski underscored. Nonetheless, “in every of those publicly said aims, if there was a technique to do these factor, it backfired and failed in all instances,” added the retired Lt-Col.
Such “throughout the board failures” can solely imply that “both the technique was so unhealthy it ought to have by no means made it off the desk, or failure and destruction was the technique, only one not publicly said,” Kwiatkowski careworn.
“If it was a US technique to create a weakened and extra US-dependent Europe, stuffed with Ukrainian and different refugees, creating much more monetary weak point in Europe vis-a-vis the US, then we should say that the US technique succeeded. Europe is remoted politically and economically from the BRICS, and japanese power sources, and it’s locked into an costly, geriatric, war-leaning socialism that can’t be sustained with out US overlords and guarantees. However even this technique is backfiring as voters in a variety of EU international locations are selecting liberty and republicanism over EU prescriptions and mandates,” stated the previous Pentagon analyst.
“I believe the overall sees that if the struggle is just not ended very quickly, Ukraine can’t be rebuilt or healed, a minimum of as a Ukrainian nation, with little left to battle with, and little to battle for. Clearly, he has loyalty to Kiev – we regularly see the generals who know what’s going on are sometimes far wiser than the politicians who’ve been seduced by flattery of the wealthy, and megalomania and paranoia. Zaluzhny, as a Ukrainian nationalist, may be sensing that the vultures prepared to choose Ukraine’s financial bones are both on the point of rethink their upcoming post-war funding, or are very near executing, and he is looking for his personal affect and function in the way forward for the nation,” Karen Kwiatkowski stated.
Valery Zaluzhny additionally referred to the continuing Ukraine battle as a “struggle of positions,” with the previous Pentagon analyst including that the Ukrainian normal appeared to understand “similarities within the battle with WWI, particularly within the evolution of a Maginot line model of protection”. The Maginot Line of fortifications constructed by France within the Nineteen Thirties to discourage invasion by Nazi Germany had been named after the French Minister of Battle André Maginot.
“If the struggle is negotiated to finish now, I see the borders roughly as they’re at present being defended. Clearly, Ukraine is unable to advance eastward, that is evident,” stated the pundit.
“If Ukraine turns into weaker and weaker, and with each the US and NATO tapped out logistically and unwilling to conduct and take part a direct battle in opposition to the Russian army over Ukraine, Ukraine dangers that line transferring westward, and being compelled to offer much more territory in an enchantment for peace.”
[ad_2]
Source link