[ad_1]
A Sydney physician who was left $24 million within the will of a former affected person has been discovered responsible {of professional} misconduct.
Basic practitioner Peter Alexakis was additionally discovered responsible of unsatisfactory skilled conduct after the tribunal probed his dealings with the affected person, who was 83 years of age when he died in November 2017.
The full inheritance left to Dr Alexakis topped $24 million, in keeping with Fairfax media.
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal choice prosecuted by the NSW Well being Care Complaints Fee was delivered this week, with an additional listening to listed to find out if any actions needs to be taken to guard public well being and security.
The fee alleged on the coronary heart of Dr Alexakis’ misconduct was his “intention to financially profit from the patient-doctor relationship”.
In 2017 Dr Alexakis visited the affected person at his Strathfield residence every day, or nearly every day, from round July 9 till October 5.
Round that point the affected person rectified his will, eradicating the Salvation Military as the principle beneficiary and as an alternative bequeathing the physician his Strathfield property and about 90 per cent of his property.
“It could be accepted that even Alexakis was shocked to find that his luck as nearly sole beneficiary amounted to multi-million {dollars},” the HCCC submitted to the tribunal.
Dr Alexakis additionally launched the affected person to his solicitor whereas he was in hospital for the aim of fixing his will, nevertheless argued he didn’t know he personally had been made a beneficiary till after the affected person died.
A neuro-psychological evaluation of the affected person carried out half a 12 months earlier than his demise discovered he had ample psychological capability to execute or change his will.
The tribunal heard testimony from a hospital-based practitioner who initially lodged the criticism and stated in coping with the affected person, Dr Alexakis “supplied extreme evaluations and failed to watch applicable skilled boundaries”.
Dr Alexakis denied his actions constituted unsatisfactory skilled conduct, arguing in a submission to the tribunal the affected person was an clever man who couldn’t be taken benefit of.
“His thoughts was sharp and he continued to efficiently share commerce till close to to his closing hospitalisation,” Dr Alexakis stated in his submission.
In the end the tribunal dominated it couldn’t be proved whether or not Dr Alexakis acted with the intention of being included within the affected person’s will.
“It could have been, however that could be a matter for conjecture,” a tribunal choice said.
One other criticism levelled at Alexakis by the HCCC alleged he prescribed oxycontin, oxycodone, fentanyl and diazepam to a different affected person who was a refugee from Afghanistan between 2008 and 2017 with out first conducting correct consultations and bodily examinations.
Dr Alexakis admitted his conduct in relation to that affected person constituted unsatisfactory skilled conduct.
[ad_2]
Source link