[ad_1]
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 21, 2022
Contact: Tim Younger | tyoung@lirs.org
Washington, D.C. – In preparation for the top of Title 42 asylum restrictions, the Biden administration introduced a brand new proposed rule severely limiting asylum eligibility for individuals who didn’t first search safety in a rustic they transited by means of to succeed in america, or who entered with out notifying a border agent. The proposed rule will likely be topic to a 30-day interval of public remark earlier than it might probably take impact.
The brand new rule mirrors a transit asylum ban first applied below the Trump administration, which was finally struck down by federal judges in a number of courts. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) supplies that folks searching for safety might apply for asylum no matter method of entry, and doesn’t require them to have first utilized for cover in a foreign country.
In response to the proposed asylum eligibility rule, Krish O’Mara Vignarajah, President and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, mentioned:
“This rule reaches into the dustbin of historical past to resurrect probably the most dangerous and unlawful anti-asylum insurance policies of the Trump administration. This transit ban defies a long time of humanitarian protections enshrined in U.S. regulation and worldwide agreements, and flagrantly violates President Biden’s personal marketing campaign guarantees to revive asylum. Requiring persecuted individuals to first search safety in international locations with no functioning asylum programs themselves is a daft and life-threatening proposal.
Whereas the Biden administration has launched a smartphone app for asylum appointments and expanded a brief parole possibility for an especially restricted subset of 4 nationalities, these measures are not any substitute for the authorized proper to hunt asylum, no matter method of entry. It’s typically probably the most weak asylum seekers who’re least doubtless to have the ability to navigate a fancy app affected by technical points, language obstacles, and overwhelming demand. Many households face quick hazard and can’t afford to attend for months on finish of their nation of persecution. To penalize them for making the lifesaving choice to hunt security at our border flies within the face of core American values.
We urge the Biden administration to reverse course earlier than this misguided rule denies safety to these most in want of it. Officers should acknowledge that a long time of deterrence-based insurance policies have had little to no impression in suppressing migration. As an alternative, they need to give attention to managing migration humanely by means of expanded parole packages, environment friendly refugee processing within the hemisphere, and an equitably accessible asylum system.”
##
[ad_2]
Source link