[ad_1]
Total, a 46% plurality of registered voters mentioned they both believed that Republican lawmakers would attempt to reduce the 2 applications (38%) or would efficiently do it (8%), whereas 37% of voters mentioned Republicans wouldn’t attempt to take action, and 17% mentioned they did not know.
Equally, extra independents believed Republicans would both attempt or really reduce the 2 applications—44% complete—than mentioned they would not attempt, 34%, with 22% undecided.
However a strong 62% of GOP voters mentioned Republicans wouldn’t attempt to reduce Social Safety and Medicare, whereas simply 21% mentioned they might both attempt (15%) or reach doing so (6%).
As Morning Seek the advice of factors out, partisan voters are principally following their social gathering’s claims on Social Safety and Medicare, with 69% of Democrats saying Republicans will attempt to reduce the applications, whereas 62% of Republicans belief Republican claims that cuts are off the desk.
However older voters, a lot of whom rely upon the applications, are least more likely to imagine that Republicans plan to focus on Social Safety and Medicare. Simply 38% of child boomers say the GOP will search to chop the applications, in comparison with 49% of Gen Xers, 52% of millennials, and 56% of Gen Zers.
It is gorgeous that so many Republican and senior voters simply refuse to imagine what their very own social gathering leaders are telling them again and again. As Every day Kos’ Joan McCarter wrote:
Take a look at Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), Home Majority Chief, who actually whiffed it final week after the speech. … “We need to strengthen Social Safety by ending numerous these authorities checks to individuals staying at residence reasonably than going to work,” Scalise mentioned. It is likely to be the primary time a Republican has endorsed work necessities for a retirement program.
And proper on cue, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has a Valentine’s Day message for seniors about Social Safety: “It is a authorized Ponzi scheme. It operates the identical approach as every other Ponzi scheme, besides that that is sanctioned by the US authorities. However it’s no much less irresponsible than a Ponzi scheme.”
Associated Articles:
[ad_2]
Source link